Home defibrillators for cardiac arrest are a lifesaving medical device. The Philips HeartStart model is the only AED on the market that can be used at home without a prescription. This defibrillator gives voice instructions so you know exactly what to do in case of an emergency. It costs approximately $1,200 and is relatively easy to operate. The Zoll AED Plus works without a hospital's supervision, making it a good choice for people who don't need a medical degree to use a defibrillator.
In the study, patients who were at risk of cardiac arrest received home defibrillators to help in the event of an emergency. Home defibrillators had a higher survival rate than those who used hospital-based devices. Nonetheless, the defibrillators were less effective in treating cardiac arrests in women and younger people. The study did not control whether the devices had any benefit in treating cardiac arrest in adults.
Despite the benefits of a home defibrillator, its lack of availability in the U.S. and Canada has sparked a frantic battle between competing companies. While Philips Electronics has the advantage of a lower price, competitors have a high price tag. Health Canada has allowed home defibrillators to be sold without a prescription. Health Canada estimates that 35,000 Canadians die of cardiac arrest every year. About 70% of these deaths occur in homes, making it essential to have at-home defibrillators on hand. Studies have shown that every minute that cardiac arrest patients are not treated with HeartSine Samaritan PAD 450 AED - Fully Automatic technology, their chances of survival are reduced by seven to 10 percent.
Sudden cardiac arrest occurs more frequently than you might think. While there are no specific preventative measures for sudden cardiac arrest, the chances of survival are much higher if you can revive someone with a home defibrillator and apply CPR. The priority is to see if the person is breathing and if their pulse is present. Call 911 if you see someone who appears unconscious. If they are, call emergency services.
Although the study did not compare the two types of devices, it did find that one was more effective than the other. Although the study was small, it did show that people who had access to home defibrillators were more likely to survive a cardiac arrest when they used them. The researchers found that people who had a home defibrillator used the device for only a small percentage of cases.
The device uses a microprocessor to analyze the heart rhythm of the patient. The device is connected to adhesive electrodes and can give either low or high-energy shocks. It also helps determine if a shock is needed, and advises the operator on what to do. This is the most important aspect since it could save the life of a person experiencing a cardiac arrest. However, it is imperative to follow the instructions carefully to avoid complications.
The results of the study were encouraging. The researchers reported that the devices helped save more lives than expected. The rate of cardiac arrests in homes was lower than expected. Nevertheless, this does not mean that there are no cases where it is impossible to perform CPR. For this reason, it may be worthwhile to purchase a home defibrillator for cardiac arrest. However, it is important to remember that home defibrillators are not as effective as professional defibrillators in emergencies. Check out this post for more details related to this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defibrillation.
